Welcome back y’all! It’s been a minute!
As many of you know, while tarot is my passion project, it is by no means my full-time job. Over the past couple of months, I’ve had some monstrous writing deadlines, so I’ve had to ease up on the blog and Instagram page; however, we are so back.
We left off on our journey in the tarot with the Four Kings Method, where I discussed the King of Wands and his relationship to actualized masculinity. I have a solid draft for a follow-up post on the King of Swords, which I’ll release soon; however, I wanted to take a quick side quest into an archetype that I’ve been communing with since New Years: The Claustrophobic Hero. This figure has been haunting me through much of the media and literature I’ve been engaged with over the past month and a half and I wanted to share with you my thoughts on this archetype, which I believe is very relevant as we march forward into what 2025 has in store for us.
My reading of the Claustrophobic Hero is one who feels entrapped by the present, longs for a nostalgic past, and is fearful of a doomed future. Instead of readily jumping on the Hero’s Journey, this archetype is stuck in place, longing for the “good old days,” “a connection to their ancestors,” or “a return to nature.” Yet, they are forced to move forward against their will toward certain doom. The archetype reveals to us the ways that we pine after nostalgic content, romanticize nature in the face of technological dystopia, and perhaps dream of days in the aftermath of the apocalypse.
I chose the phrase “Claustrophobic,” as I was viscerally reminded of the scholar Dr. Tara Brabazon’s theory of Claustropolitan Sociology. She stated: “We view a world that is never ours to own and experience. It is seen through miniaturized digital technologies. Such an environment creates paranoia and irrationality and perpetuates a sense of powerlessness. The only light at the end of the tunnel is that of a freight train hurtling towards us, gaining speed and getting ever closer.”
As a citizen in the Claustropolis, our bodies are tensed up
and prepared for impact; yet, impact does not happen, rather we are held
perpetually in a state of constant anticipation. The world does not provide the
catharsis to release the pressure. Thus, we must act, in the present, for the
good of the future, even if it means the destruction of our own self-concept, a
radical change in our environment, and the possibility of failure.
The Archetype in the Cards
Rather than a single card, I believe the Claustrophobic Hero
can be found within a clustering of cards; trapped within a web of nostalgia,
anxiety, and hope for the future. At the center, we find The Fool (0), who
stands on the edge of the abyss. However, unlike The Fool (0) we know to be
fearless and alive with a sense of adventure, this Fool (0) stands at the edge
and is frozen in time. On the one hand, he is pulled backwards into the past by
the VI of Cups, and longs for days long gone. On the other hand, he rests
within a present dominated by the VIII of Swords, unable to move because he is
bound in the eternal present. The future, represented by the V of Pentacles,
looks bleak and worse than where he stands in the present. However, the VIII of
Wands hovers overhead and demands that he make a decision and move in any
direction, as stagnancy will result in certain destruction of the spirit.
Under these conditions, the Claustrophobic Hero relies on his environment to push him toward action. Perhaps his vacation in the past has made him forget how to take a step forward? Perhaps the visions of the beggars outside the cathedral induce a paralysis. Maybe the forcefulness of the Wands causes him to retreat into himself. Perhaps he feels there must be a perfect plan in place before he can take his first step. However, these feelings are neither helpful nor productive, as they all spiral down into a state of stagnancy. The Fool (0) must move or he shall die on the edge of the cliff. A corpse on the side of Mt Everest.
The Claustrophobic Hero aligns with what I perceive to be a
dominant disposition in our current cultural moment. Across the internet we bare
witness to traditional lifestyles (“TradLife”) which romanticize a fictional
past, a paralyzed politics which refuses to move forward for fear of
disruption, and a general despair for the future. The despair comes becomes embodied
through climate anxiety, declining birth rates, war, and economic precarity.
There exists no counter argument for imagining a positive future, no utopian
vision to drive action, no hope for what seems like a civilization running full
steam on a Thanatos drive. In this context, I wanted to explore this archetype:
Why is the past beckoning to his so aggressively? What do with do with a present
locked in time? What is our responsibility to ensure the future does occur?
What is to be Done?
At the beginning of the year, I made it a point to complete
a book I had been procrastinating: Goodbye to a River by John Graves.
The author documents his journey by boat from Possum Kingdom Lake to Lake
Whitney in North Texas during the mid-20th century. Graves and I
share a locational and cultural heritage, we both grew up along the Brazos
River. For me, one set of grandparents had a ranch up north, past Possum
Kingdom, while the other set lived along the river south of Granbury. Reading
his story filled me with ambivalence; I found myself longing for my own past
along the river at the same time Graves also longed for his past along the
river. Yet, a feeling of alienation came over me, as he reminisced for a river
that was not my own, nor was the river he travel remotely similar to the river
of my youth. It was like we shared in a sense of nostalgia that could seem
similar on the surface, yet in actuality, was not.
This difference, matters. Graves is not interested in pining
after the past. Rather, he teaches us how to find closure and become
comfortable with the past: “The provincial who cultivates only his roots is in
peril, potato-like, of becoming more root than plant. The man who cuts his
roots away and denies that they were ever connected with him withers into half
a man.” Because time always moves forward, one cannot hope to keep a full
connection to the past, and it is not healthy to let nostalgia prevent us from
moving forward. However, we must also not neglect the past, as he also notes, “What
that self is tangles itself knottily with what his people were, and what they
came out of. Mine came out of Texas, as did I. If those were louts, they were
my own louts.”
Similarly, the Icelandic artist, Bjork spoke to this idea of
carrying the past with you in her album Fossora in her song,
“Ancestress.” In it, she describes the process of exchanging responsibility for
the future from the hands of our elders to our own and then to the future
generation.
My ancestress' clock is ticking
Her once vibrant rebellion is fading
I am her hopekeeper
I assure hope is there
At, at all times
For Bjork, the past is important because it is the source of
our motivation to push forward into the unknown. Rather than be tethered to it,
we should take responsibility for making sure the hopes, dreams, and visions of
those who gave us our present are carried into the future. Even when the
present is horrifying and the future seems doomed.
For that reason, I started 2025 by watching all three Lord
of the Rings movies (extended edition, obviously). At the core of the
story, we witness the changing of the times and how even the smallest of
creatures are responsible for building the future. I think a valuable lesson
for the Claustrophobic Hero can be learned from the elves of Middle Earth, whom
realized that the infinitely long past they had once lived was coming to an
end. Rather than despairing, they not only accepted that their age was over,
but also came to the aid of the men who would inherit the new age. There was
not a fearfulness or bitterness in their loss of the past; rather, they
recognized their responsibility to ensure that the next age was a peaceful one.
We are currently facing the Claustropolitan Age, where
paranoia and fear dance across a landscape of exploitative work, a
disconnection between humans, and a present that is relentlessly being
preserved and played back on repeat. We know the train is coming, but we do not
have the privilege to see it race toward us. Rather, we are entrapped in social
media algorithms, which feed us the same content over-and-over-and-over again.
Entertainment companies are hell bent on forcing us to relive our childhoods
through endless, poor quality CGI remakes and sequels. We are told not to trust
or care for our neighbors, divided amongst ourselves with unjust political
slogans calling for justice. As Bjork
articulated: “Our differences are irrelevant; to demand absolute justice at all
times, blocks connection; our union is stronger, our union is stronger than us.
Hope is a muscle that allows us to connect.”
However, this is a hard ask. Enemies lurk behind every
shadow and while we cannot see the train coming to destroy us, we know it is
there. We hoard toilet paper, eggs, and build apocalyptic bunkers to seal away
the present as best we can. The past also calls to us longingly, like a ghost,
it lures us into the cold embrace of death. We are too busy preventing the
future, we accept our own death through refusing to allow the present to move
and by clinging to ages that will never be again.
Despite the lessons from Graves, Bjork, and the elves of
Middle Earth, the Claustrophobic Hero perceives that his present is uniquely
evil and will go on forever. However, Engles and the ladies of 9 to 5
remind us that the past may have been much worse and it was also overcome. For
example, during the Industrial Revolution, society was also ensnared into a
nostalgic possession by the past. Technology had developed at such a breakneck
speed, people were forced to move into the cities, and the overall quality of
life plummeted for the average person, according to Engles. Poverty,
homelessness, disease, violence, hunger were all normal and highly visible
parts of every day life. Workers were pitted against each other to compete for
low wages and degrading working conditions, while their quality of life, their
families, and the society they once knew evaporated within their lifetime; it
was their own post-apocalypse. However, things were not perpetually frozen, rather,
a series of labor movements, revolutions, and wars were fought up and through
the mid-century, which radically changed the overall quality of life for
people.
Yet, as we know being humans in the 2020s, progress is not
inevitable and it must be earned. In the 1980s, 9 to 5 captured the mood
of the neoliberal, capitalist hellscape for women workers. From abuse to sexual
harassment, the ladies in the office were forced to choose between paying the
bills and taking care of their families or standing up for themselves and their
dignity. Because the movie is an absurdist-comedy, the women opted to kidnap
their supervisor and usurp his authority to make sweeping changes to the
working conditions of their fellow workers; which they got away with. While kidnapping
your boss is not my personal strategy, the movie serves two purposes: 1.
Progress is not a given; over a 100-years after Engles, working conditions improved,
but had to be continuously earned; and 2. You need to enact radical change in
order to move toward a brighter future.
Unfortunately, the Claustrophobic Hero refuses to step off
the cliff and be radical for the sake of the future. For him, the cliff is not
“unknown,” but rather, it is a vision of certain destruction. We have accepted
that the end of the world is upon us and we wait in anticipation (almost
longingly) for the bomb to drop and usher in the nuclear winter. However, unbeknownst
to us, even if the bomb drops, it will not represent the end of time. In
Tatyana Tolstaya’s novel, The Slynx, we are met with a Moscow in the far
distant future, long after the bomb. People are still people (despite their odd
physical characteristics, due to mutations from radiation). Society is still
unjust. There is still a crisis to find meaning and purpose. And unfortunately,
there are still people who were alive on the planet prior to the nuclear
winter, who have been cursed with immortality. Nostalgia is their opium as they
despair for the changes in society due to their inaction in their own time.
Conclusion
The Claustropolitan Hero is a figure of tragedy. He is
frozen in place and awaits his own destruction. The past is his nostalgic opium
and the present is treated like a commodity to be hoarded and treasured at the
expense of the future. He is blocked from those around him and is forced into
circumstances that leave him adrift in a sea of uncertainty. However, he can be
spurred into action. If we return to the image of The Fool (0), he is not
alone; his little dog reaches out to him. I believe, when considering this face
of The Fool (0), the dog be our salvation, giving us the nudge into the future,
off the cliff, into our own destruction. Ultimately, I think refusing to jump
off the cliff is more dangerous than standing still. While that catalyst is
unclear at the moment, we must prepare for the push into the unknown, otherwise,
the train will come for us and we won’t make it.
Comments
Post a Comment